Top Five Books of 2010

January 28, 2011

In no particular order, though there are two books that could potentially be the favourites of the year.

 

The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas by John Boyne.

This is one clever book. The blurb on the non movie cover reads as:

“The story of “The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas” is very difficult to describe. Usually we give some clues about the book on the cover, but in this case we think that would spoil the reading of the book. We think it is important that you start to read without knowing what it is about. If you do start to read this book, you will go on a journey with a nine-year-old boy called Bruno. (Though this isn’t a book for nine-year-olds.) And sooner or later you will arrive with Bruno at a fence. We hope you never have to cross such a fence.”

This blurb essentially sums up the feeling you get when you read the book. There is a constant ambiguity, there is always the sense that there is more to the story that you can see, which of course there is. Boyne tells the story without trying to say what is really going on, what is really happening, but of course you can start to work it out for yourself. The ending is shocking, thought provoking, surprising, unexpected. There are many words to describe it. Incredible.

 

Maurice by E.M. Forster.

I was already familiar with the story because of the film version (starring James Wilby, who I love, just a little bit), but as with most adaptation, there was so much more to the book. It does sag a little in the middle and Maurice’s constant mood did start to grate a little, but it did seem justified and by the end, it was definitely worth ploughing through the middle. The second to last paragraph was just brilliant, one of the best passages I’ve ever read.

 

Goodbye To All That by Robert Graves.

My knowledge of Robert Graves was pretty basic before I started the book. I knew he was a poet, a soldier, a friend of Sassoon but really didn’t know much else about his life. As Graves’ book is considered one of the best pieces of writing about the First World War, I had to read it. I hadn’t realised how badly Graves had been injured and how this was why he’d been able to step in and stop Sassoon getting in real trouble (Google it), so this added another level of understanding for me. I found it really easy to read and some parts of it were really quite funny. Fantastic book, made me more interested in Graves than I had been before.

 

And Then There Were None by Agatha Christie.

Brilliance from the true master of murder mysteries. It was different to how I expected because it wasn’t following one of the detectives, because there was no detective. There was an omniscient narrator and what really happened all alone the plot was always a mystery, always had a question over it. I had no idea how the plot would work out, how a solution would work, how anything would work out. Christie answered all my questions in two pages. Just brilliant.

 

War Horse by Michael Morpurgo.

A book being told from the point of view of a horse doesn’t really sound up to much when you think about it. But of course, it’s up to a lot. I first came aware of it because of the play (which is probably the best thing ever playing London right now), and obviously reading the book was the next step. The plot of the book is quite different to the play as the play focuses more on Albert and his story due to the fact that you can’t really have a horse talking on stage in a serious play about the First World War. Some of the elements of the story are different too, such as the reason Albert leaves home to go to war and where he ends up when his happens. I actually preferred the storyline in the play, probably because this was the one I was exposed to first but I still adored the book.

Into the Wardrobe: My adventures in Narnia

January 13, 2011

It’s happened. I’ve finally taken notice of a book/film recommendation and it’s worked for me.

So, last month a film came out called The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader. I knew one of my friends wanted to see it, so I suggested we see it together. I then realised I really ought to see the previous film in case I had no idea of what was going on.

I was…unexcited at first. I wasn’t really sure what to expect or whether this was really my thing at all (I don’t really do fantasy, my limits start and stop somewhere around Harry Potter). I nearly cried at the beginning of The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe, because I wasn’t expecting that to happen, I found myself cursing Edmund for being so stupid and selfish and cheering on the other three siblings for being brave and generally kind of adorable.

I didn’t fall for Prince Caspian as much. It just wasn’t as good and I found Ben Barnes’s awful accent really distracting. The fight scene with Peter and Miraz was probably one of my favourite parts, not sure why, maybe a throw over from my enjoyment of the sword fights in Merlin.

I bought five of the books for 50p each from CEX and tried to read them. I say tried because of a massive printing cock-up in chapter three of The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe left me with about thirty pages of The Horse and His Boy in the middle. So I’m stuck until I buy another copy, which should be easy enough, but it’s me and I’m fussy.

Also, I usually hate allegories, because I think if you’re trying to say something just say it instead of hiding it in messages and clues, but I kind of like this one. I like the idea of Aslan’s country and how you supposedly get there (or not get there, of course) and I’m sure it’ll open up further for me once I actually make headway on the books.

Enid Blyton.

November 26, 2010

Yeah, yeah, I know I’m supposed to be working on that novel I’m writing but I’m on a writing lull and had a blog idea. (Rare, I know!)

OK, so, the title of this blog probably gives away what this entry is going to be about – but I am in fact going to focus on one particular series of Blyton’s – The Secret Seven.

The Secret Seven were always my favourite. The Famous Five – forget it? The Five Find Outers? Nah.

The Seven themselves: Peter, Janet, Jack, Colin, George, Pam and Barbara (The dog Scamper wasn’t a member of the society, unlike Timmy in The Famous Five.) were probably my favourite fictional characters as a child. Jack was always my favourite, I’m not sure why, but this might explain why I had a phase of Jack being my favourite boys name for a while.

I haven’t read any of them for a while. I have a collected edition of some of the stories at home but started one and never finished it. I recently bought three collected editions from Asda because they were in the sale (not that I thought twice about it!) so I may have to begin dipping into those soon (It will probably take less than an hour to read one complete story).

I have decided though that I want to read all of them. There are 14 novels all together (I think) and a short story collection. So depending on how hard it is to find all of them (because I will be buying them from charity shops to try and make sure I don’t buy the new modernised editions – more on that.) and read them. I’m sure as a child I didn’t read them all, so I want to complete my Secret Seven education.

On the matter of the modernisation. I can’t understand it. The books are a portrait of their times. They are as much as nostalgia item as they are a new exiting adventure for the next generation. I’m sure that if I have children they will read the original texts! I can’t understand why they think the work needs to be changed and edited and as far as I know it hasn’t really been happening to anyone else. They don’t take old stories like Winnie the Pooh or Paddington or any classic children’s books and strip them of their original sentiment  to make them accessible for children nowadays. I encourage reading in children, of course, but I’m sure they’re capable of just asking if they don’t understand something.

The ‘jolly hocky sticks’ and ‘ginger beer’ sentiment and language are what people know and love these books for. Leave it be.

And who knows, after I’ve consumed the Secret Seven library, I might give that Famous Five a chance.

Brideshead and Belief.

November 23, 2010

Been thinking a lot about this sort of thing lately, and because I am a book geek have managed to work in some literary connection somewhere! (And let’s not let this turn into a religious debate!)

I was thinking about how I believe in things and that a lot of the Christian stories and tales that I actually believe are usually the nice ones. Then I remembered this conversation from Brideshead Revisited.

“But, my dear Sebastian, you can’t seriously believe it all.”
“Can’t I?”
“I mean about Christmas and the star and the three kings and the ox and the ass.”
“Oh yes, I believe that. It’s a lovely idea.”
“But you can’t believe things because they’re a lovely idea.”
“But I do. That’s how I believe.”

Thank you, Evelyn Waugh, for capturing my thoughts exactly over 40 years before I was born.

Life as a writer.

July 18, 2010

OK, we’re veering off the subject slightly, but go with it.

I often wonder what people think when they ask me what I’m studying at Uni.

“Writing.” I say, as if this is will actually help.

The first inevitable question usually is: “Oh, what sort of thing do you write?”

I try to explain that while I really will have a go at mostly anything, I do mainly write about World War One. Cue the strange looks and ‘Oh’s’ from people who are probably thinking “Well, I wasn’t expecting that” or “Isn’t that a man’s subject?”

I also wonder if people see writing as a form of pretension. As a writer you have to believe that you are writing something that people want to read and that people will spend money on to buy. Yes, it is a little pretentious, but that’s all right, isnt it?

Isn’t it?

Nineteen Minutes

January 12, 2010

First review of the blog! I try not to spoil but be warned, that’s all I’m saying!

 

Nineteen Minutes by Jodi Picoult

Pages: 579

Publisher: Hodder

Year of publication: 2007

Jodi Picoult’s first book, Songs of the Humpback Whale was published in 1992, but the book she is probably most associated with is her 2004 novel, My Sister’s Keeper. The premise of most of her books follows the same flashback and forward narrative, jumping from the day of the event, backwards to things that could have affected the people involved, and the fall out of the event.

    Nineteen Minutes is the story of a school shooting in the fictional town of Sterling in New Hampshire. A student, Peter Houghton, believed to be the victim of bullying, enters the school with a gun and kills nine students, a teacher and wounds nineteen other people.

    As the story unfolds, we find out about certain events that could have caused Peter to carry out such a crime. The story is told from flashbacks and flash-forwards from a variety of characters, including Peter, Josie, a girl who was once friends with Peter but then joined the popular crowd, Josie’s mother, Alex, a judge who is forced to step down from overseeing the case, as well as Peter’s parents and defence attorney.

    At times, I found the plot a little generic and stereotypical, for example, having Peter being obsessed with video games and at one point doubting his own sexuality, which are two things attributed to school violence, usually without any evidence. I thought making Peter out to be what many people believe is the perpetrator of such crimes was almost a cop out and that Picoult could have made the character different to what the reader was expecting and given.

    The plot twist, if you pay close attention a few chapters before it is revealed is obvious. Without actually saying what it is, all I can say is that I guessed what it was, only to be proved right a chapter later. Whether this is intentional or not is unknown, but it could also mean that the reader will feel a sense of being privy to something that the majority of the characters don’t know.

    The book in constructed in an interesting way, and as it goes on you learn more and more about the motives of Peter and the intertwining lives of everyone involved in the shooting. I think Picoult could have told us more about Josie’s boyfriend, Matt as he came across as a one dimensional, stereotypical jock, who wasn’t really all that nice. I felt that if the audience knew more about him, it would give a greater understanding of events surrounding his death.

   Overall, while I found some of the plot points a little predictable and parts of it a little stereotypical, I will say that I enjoyed the book. I enjoyed the way we were not shown everything up front and didn’t have to sit through pages and pages of courtroom scenes, instead having them divided by back story. At times I did find it difficult to connect with the characters, but once I got into the book, I began to enjoy it more.

Hello!

January 11, 2010

Hello all.

As an avid reader, I have decided review all the books I read, mainly for fun but also so come December I can actually remember everything I’ve read this year!

I am currently writing the first review as I finished the first book of the year last night!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.